Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 22 > Issue 6 (1924)
Abstract
A case recently decided in the United States Supreme Court, Giles et al. v. Vette et al., Sup. Ct. U. S. Adv. Ops. Jan. 7, 1924, No. 59, gives us another illustration of the clever way in which the codifiers of the UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT steered their course between the epithetical jurisprudence, built upon the case of Waugh v. Carver, [1793] 2 Henry Blackstone, 235, and the jurisprudence of realities, derived from the interpretation of Cox v. Hickman, [1861] 8 H. of L. cases, 268, by the English court in Mollwo v. Court of Wards, [1872] 4 P. C. App. 419, and by the Michigan court in Beecher v. Bush (1881) 45 Mich. 188.
Recommended Citation
THE PASSING OF THE PARTNERSHIP BY OPERATION OF LAW,
22
Mich. L. Rev.
588
(1924).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol22/iss6/9