Note and Comment

Authors

Edson R. Sunderland, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
Edwin D. Dickinson, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
Horace LaFayette Wilgus, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
Willard T. Barbour, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
Victor H. Lane, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow

Abstract

The Writ of Prohibition - Procedural Delay - A disheartening recrudescence of procedural red-tape is found in a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio. A contest arose over the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission to fix telephone rates in Cleveland. The Commission was engaged in a determination as to the reasonableness of a schedule of rates filed by the telephone company, when a petition was filed in the Common Pleas Court for an injunction against the charging of rates other than those fixed by a city ordinance.

Recommended Citation

Edson R. Sunderland, Edwin D. Dickinson, Horace L. Wilgus, Willard T. Barbour & Victor H. Lane, Note and Comment, 17 Mich. L. Rev. 165 (1918).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol17/iss2/5