Revisiting the “Tradition of Local Control” in Public Education

Authors

Carter Brace, University of Michigan Law School

Abstract

In Milliken v. Bradley, the Supreme Court declared “local control” the single most important tradition of public education. Milliken and other related cases developed this notion of a tradition, which has frustrated attempts to achieve equitable school funding and desegregation through federal courts. However, despite its significant impact on American education, most scholars have treated the “tradition of local control” as doctrinally insignificant. These scholars depict the tradition either as a policy preference with no formal legal meaning or as one principle among many that courts may use to determine equitable remedies. This Note argues that the Supreme Court conceived of the tradition not merely as good policy or remedial law but as a principle that was supported by multiple freestanding constitutional provisions. It shows how the policy and remedial law explanations for the tradition do not fully explain the Court’s reasoning. It then demonstrates that the Court located the tradition in the federal Constitution’s guarantees of substantive due process, the right to vote, federalism, and the separation of powers.

Recommended Citation

Carter Brace, Revisiting the “Tradition of Local Control” in Public Education, 122 Mich. L. Rev. 97 (2023).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol122/iss1/4