Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 107 > Issue 8 (2009)
This Article calls for the recognition of a comparative fault defense in contract law. Part I sets the framework for this defense and suggests the situations in which it should apply. These situations are sorted under two headings: cases of noncooperation and cases of overreliance. Part II unfolds the main argument for recognizing the defense and recommends applying the defense only in cases where cooperation or avoidance of overreliance is low cost.
A Comparative Fault Defense in Contract Law,
Mich. L. Rev.
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol107/iss8/5