Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 105 > Issue 7 (2007)
Abstract
I recently reviewed God vs. the Gavel by Professor Marci Hamilton, and she published a brief response. My review briefly summarized the book and then made three principal points, addressing Hamilton's institutional competence thesis, her "no-harm" principle, and the remarkable number of legal and factual errors in the book. In this reply, I will review each of these points in turn.
Recommended Citation
Douglas Laycock,
God vs. the Gavel: A Brief Rejoinder,
105
Mich. L. Rev.
1545
(2007).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol105/iss7/12
Included in
Jurisprudence Commons, Legal Writing and Research Commons, Legislation Commons, Religion Law Commons