Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 10 > Issue 8 (1912)
Abstract
The case of Henry v. Dick recently decided by the Supreme Court of the United States, has occasioned considerable unfavorable comment in the public press. It seems to be the opinion of many that the decision lays down a new principle of law, particularly adaptable to the working of a monopoly, and that the public is, under the supposed new principle, exposed to a practically unlimited exploitation by any patentee. It is believed that neither of these contentions is correct.
Recommended Citation
Edward S. Rogers,
Restrictions on the use of Patented Articles,
10
Mich. L. Rev.
608
(1912).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol10/iss8/1