Abstract
This essay argues that the concept of post-nationalism does not precisely explain the American concept of citizenship. This is due to the strict construction of the nation state in American constitutional theory, the ineffective role of international human rights norms in American jurisprudence, and the extension of protection to non-citizens based on territorialist rationales. For these reasons, the author suggests that denizenship is a more appropriate way of viewing the American citizenship model, and is one that explains how notions of personal identity can be transnational while still justifiable within traditional nation-state constructs.
Recommended Citation
T. A. Aleinikoff,
Between National and Post-National: Membership in the United States,
4
Mich. J. Race & L.
241
(1999).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol4/iss2/1