Abstract
In the wake of the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri, advocates and activists called for greater oversight and accountability for police. One of the measures called for and adopted in many jurisdictions was the implementation of body cameras in police departments. Many treated this implementation as a sign of change that police officers would be held accountable for the violence they perpetrate. This Note argues that although body-camera footage may be useful as one form of evidence in cases of police violence, lawyers and judges should be extremely careful about how it is presented to the jury. Namely, the jury should be made aware of their own implicit biases and of the limited nature of the footage. Taking a look at the biases that all jurors hold as well as the inherent subjectivity of video footage, this Note shows how implicit biases and the myth of video objectivity can create problems in viewing body-camera footage and the footage should, therefore, be treated carefully when introduced at trial.
Recommended Citation
Morgan A. Birck,
Do You See What I See? Problems with Juror Bias in Viewing Body-Camera Video Evidence,
24
Mich. J. Race & L.
153
(2018).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol24/iss1/6