Abstract
The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) affords various protections to Indian families throughout child welfare proceedings. Among them is the duty imposed upon the state to provide rehabilitative services to families prior to the outplacement of an Indian child, or termination of parental rights. An analogous provision for non-Indians in the Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA) excuses rehabilitative services in "aggravated circumstances" of child abuse. The ICWA contains no such exception, and that absence has been controversial. In 2002, the Alaska Supreme Court applied ASFA's aggravated circumstances exception to the ICWA, thereby excusing services when a father severely abused his three Native children. In 2005, the South Dakota Supreme Court addressed the same issue, but expressly refused to engraft such an exception into the ICWA. This Note defends South Dakota's position on policy grounds. It chiefly argues that an aggravated circumstances exception would do violence to the ICWA and its family preservation goals, and further that such an exception is unnecessary to protect Native children from dangerous parents.
Recommended Citation
C. E. Davis,
In Defense of the Indian Child Welfare Act In Aggravated Circumstances,
13
Mich. J. Race & L.
433
(2008).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol13/iss2/3
Included in
Family Law Commons, Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Legislation Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons