Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
2012
Abstract
In the debates about whether to take constitutionalism beyond the state, the European Union invariably looms large. One element, in particular, that invites scholars to grapple with the analogy between the European Union and global governance is the idea of legal pluralism. Just as the European legal order is based on competing claims of ultimate legal authority among the European Union and its member states, so, too, the global legal order, to the extent that we can speak of one, lacks a singular, uncontested hierarchy among its various parts. To be sure, some have argued that the UN Charter provides for a basic ordering of the international legal system akin to a constitutional charter. Others urge us to view the World Trade Organization as the foundation for global constitutional order. And yet legal and institutional fragmentation among the various regimes in the international arena broadly persists, as in the unsettled relationship among, say, trade, environmental, and human rights regimes.
Publication Information & Recommended Citation
Halberstam, Daniel. "Constitutional Heterarchy: The Centrality of Conflict in the European Union and the United States." In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law and Global Governance, edited by Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, 326-355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627088.012
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons
Comments
Reproduced with permission. All rights reserved. Copyright 2012 Cambridge University Press. Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627088.012