Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2017
Abstract
"In recent years, Tesla Motors (recently renamed Tesla) has been engaged in a state-by-state ground way for the right to distribute it’s all-electric vehicles directly to consumers. The car dealers' lobby, with the political backing of General Motors, has fiercely battled back, relying on decades-old state dealer protection laws to argue that Tesla is legally bound to distribute through franchised dealers. Through a combination of favorable state legislative and judicial decisions, Tesla has won the right to distribute directly in many states, but remains categorically barred from direct distribution in important states like Michigan and Texas--and hence all direct distribution given its business model. While Tesla has taken the lead in fighting the issue, many other new entrants to the automobile market, such as Elio Motors, are closely watching the issue, hoping that Tesla's success will free up access to the heavily regulated U.S. automobile market."
Recommended Citation
Crane, Daniel A. "Why Intrabrand Dealer Competition Is Irrelevant to the Price Effects of Tesla's Vertical Integration." U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 165 (2017): 179-90.
Included in
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Consumer Protection Law Commons, Legislation Commons, Transportation Law Commons