Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 30 > Issue 7 (1932)
Abstract
When the Federal Union was substituted for the loose confederation which had preceded it, one of the most impelling reasons for the change was the need for a united international front, which could only be achieved by further concentration in a central government of the power to deal with foreign nations. A necessary part of this general plan was the treaty-making power, taken from the states by Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, and lodged in the President and the Senate by Article II, Section II.
Recommended Citation
John S. Tennant,
THE JUDICIAL PROCESS OF TREATY INTERPRETATION IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT,
30
Mich. L. Rev.
1016
(1932).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss7/3
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, International Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons