FEDERAL PRACTISE-REVIEW OF FACTS-INSTANCE OF WHEN VERDICT MUST BE DIRECTED

Authors

Abstract

This was a case in which a motion for a directed verdict was denied by the trial court on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to justify a submission of the case to the jury. The circuit court of appeals affirmed this, but on appeal to the Supreme Court it was held error. Southern Ry. Co. v. Walters (U.S. 1931) 52 Sup. Ct. 58.

Recommended Citation

FEDERAL PRACTISE-REVIEW OF FACTS-INSTANCE OF WHEN VERDICT MUST BE DIRECTED, 30 Mich. L. Rev. 1119 (1932).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss7/20