Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 30 > Issue 5 (1932)
Abstract
Defendant contracted to buy land from plaintiff for $2500. He was to have the right to immediate possession when the balance due was reduced to $1000, but he took possession at once, apparently without objection from plaintiff. A year later, the payments made totalling only $150, plaintiff sued for the unpaid balance, and for rent for the year. Held, he was entitled to both. Prouty v. Tupper (S. D. I93I) 236 N.W. 303.
Recommended Citation
VENDOR AND PURCHASER - LIABILITY OF PURCHASER IN POSSESSION FOR RENT,
30
Mich. L. Rev.
816
(1932).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss5/34