Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 30 > Issue 2 (1931)
Abstract
The manager of one of defendant's branch stores, in filling an order for a loaf of bread, delivered a dead rat to the plaintiff. The plaintiff incurred serious physical injuries as a result of the fright and shock. In plaintiff's suit against the defendant company it was held that there could be a recovery for physical injuries caused by fright alone. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. Roch (Md. 1931) 153 Atl. 22.
Recommended Citation
TORTS - RECOVERY FOR INJURIES CAUSED BY FRIGHT,
30
Mich. L. Rev.
315
(1931).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol30/iss2/32