Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 29 > Issue 1 (1930)
Abstract
Defendant was an agent with authority to purchase land for his principal, the plaintiff, and to take options in his own name. Instead, he took contract title in his own name. Plaintiff furnished the entire consideration. In a suit in which the vendor was joined as plaintiff, held, that the land contract be reformed by inserting the name of the plaintiff as purchaser. Goss v. McKinney (Mich. 1930) 229 N.W. 450.
Recommended Citation
REFORMATION-TRUSTS-STRANGER TO THE INSTRUMENT,
29
Mich. L. Rev.
120
(1930).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol29/iss1/28