Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 13 > Issue 2 (1914)
Abstract
What has been said in the preceding part of this discussion addresses itself to the proposition that the SHERMAN Act does not mean what the District Court assumed it to mean. Naturally, such a negative discussion must be preliminary to a consideration of the more .comprehensive question "What does the SHERMAN ACT mean?" For, of course, even if the theory of the law upon which the District Court based its judgment was erroneous, still that fact would be of little or no practical importance if any tenable theory of the law were to justify the judgment.
Recommended Citation
Clarence E. Eldridge,
New Interpretation of the Sherman Act,
13
Mich. L. Rev.
113
(1914).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol13/iss2/2