Abstract
Student body diversity-and the purported educational benefits diversity bestows- is the final Supreme Court-endorsed justification for affirmative action by public universities. Are the benefits of diversity indeed "substantial," as the Grutter majority claimed? The author analyzes the social scientific research upon which the Court relied in articulating the diversity interest. By critiquing its theory and methodology, the author shows how the research fails to prove educational benefits; and by considering the logic underlying social science generally, he shows how the causal relationship is, technically, not provable. The author questions, then, how the diversity interest can possibly be compelling.
Recommended Citation
Brian N. Lizotte,
The Diversity Rationale: Unprovable, Uncompelling,
11
Mich. J. Race & L.
625
(2006).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol11/iss2/8
