Abstract
If any court is linked to the “law and economics” movement, it is the Seventh Circuit, home of former Judge Richard Posner, the “Chicago School,” and analysis based on markets and economics. It thus comes as a surprise that in college-athletics cases, the court has replaced economic analysis with legal formalisms. In adopting a deferential approach that would uphold nearly every rule the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) claims is related to amateurism, the court recalls the pre- Chicago School era, in which courts aggressively applied “per se” illegality based on a restraint’s form, rather than substance. While the Seventh Circuit’s detour of deference has taken several stops, this Essay focuses on the most recent, the 2018 decision in Deppe v. NCAA.
Recommended Citation
Michael A. Carrier & Marc Edelman,
College Athletics: The Chink in the Seventh Circuit's "Law and Economics" Armor,
117
Mich. L. Rev. Online
90
(2019).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_online/vol117/iss1/7
Included in
Courts Commons, Education Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons