Abstract
Building on the author’s recent article Protecting Commoners’ Goods: Pluralist Coexistence Through the Common Good Constitution’s Subsidiarity Municipalism (PCG), this Essay deconstructs the recent New York appellate opinion in Vincent v. Adams. That case reverses a trial court opinion that PCG criticizes as an example of how current law misunderstands the proper relationship between local government and federal and state authorities. This Essay uses the appellate court decision in Vincent v. Adams to reinforce PCG’s thesis of subsidiarity municipalism, to offer another illustration of subsidiarity municipalism’s progressive potential, and to suggest how subsidiarity municipalism can inform the relationship between state and local bodies on budgetary questions.
Recommended Citation
Gregory E. Louis,
Subsidiarity Municipalism in Action: On Vincent v. Adams,
59
U. Mich. J. L. Reform Caveat
1
(2026).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr_caveat/vol59/iss1/1