Abstract
This football season, millions of Americans enjoying their favorite pastime might feel pangs of a guilty conscience. Years of scientific research into the long-term neurological effects of tackle football and a recent settlement between the National Football League (NFL) and thousands of retired NFL players have made football-related traumatic brain injuries (TBI) a topic of national conversation. Current and former NFL players and even President Obama have participated in the conversation, saying that they would hesitate to let their sons play the game for fear of possible brain injury. Because research has uncovered signs of permanent brain damage in players as young as eighteen-years-old, and has suggested that everyday subconcussive blows during football practice could be the cause of such brain damage, one scientist has called for a ban on tackle football at the youth level. In light of these findings, current state laws are inadequate to address the very real risks associated with youth tackle football. In general, these laws do not attempt to prevent concussions, but rather address treatment for concussions following the injury. Furthermore, state laws entirely fail to address the daily, subconcussive blows suffered by youth players. To fully protect their youngest football players from the devastating effects of football-related TBIs, state legislators should ban tackle football for children under fourteen-years-old.
Recommended Citation
Adam Bulkley,
Comment,
For the Love of the Game: The Case for State Bans on Youth Tackle Football,
48
U. Mich. J. L. Reform Caveat
1
(2014).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr_caveat/vol48/iss1/1
Included in
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Juvenile Law Commons, Medical Jurisprudence Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons