Abstract
This Note argues that unfettered use of cultural evidence by prosecutors creates the same problems as would the use of evidence of race to show propensity of the accused to act. Using Wisconsin v. Chu as a case study, the author demonstrates that cultural evidence, just as any other evidence to show propensity to act, must rest upon the proper evidentiary foundation and that prosecutors must be sharply constrained in their use of cultural evidence.
Recommended Citation
Peter Chung,
Standard of Review for Prosecutorial Use of Race Evidence During Trial,
38
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
237
(2004).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol38/iss1/5