Home > Journals > University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform > JLR > Volume 25 > Issues 3&4 (1992)
Abstract
Parts I and II discuss the preservation idea itself and the history of museums' participation in cultural preservation efforts. Parts III and IV then look specifically at the repatriation issue, providing some background on initiatives that have influenced peoples' thoughts and actions. Finally, Part V outlines and discusses some of the issues that have made resolution of the repatriation issue particularly complex.
Recommended Citation
Peter H. Welsh,
Repatriation and Cultural Preservation: Potent Objects, Potent Pasts,
25
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
837
(1992).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol25/iss3/8
Included in
Cultural Heritage Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law Commons