In this action, Plaintiffs sought a writ of mandamus compelling the offending judges to write better, but the court below denied the writ. Plaintiffs then petitioned for relief from poor writing. Because some judges do, in fact, write clear and effective opinions, we have granted certiorari to resolve the differences between the various courts. The issue before us, then, is whether judges and clerks have abused their discretion by writing weak opinions and, if so, how they can improve their writing. Because stronger writing greatly eases the reader's job and makes opinions more effective, we hold that judges and clerks must write better. We, therefore, reverse the court below.
Erik P. Belt,
Concerned Readers v. Judicial Opinion Writers,
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol23/iss3/4