Abstract
The natural question raised by the passage of "Tenant Rights" legislation is whether the new law helps or hinders the practicing attorney representing tenants. In analyzing the package of Tenant Rights Bills enacted in Michigan in 1968 this article will focus on three questions: 1) whether such legislation raises false hopes in being heralded as a major declaration of rights and an effort to solve the problem of housing shortage; 2) whether such legislation actually further oppresses tenants, especially in their exercise of the one effective instrument in their power: collective action; and 3) whether such legislation significantly changes the relationship and the power of tenants in public housing viz-a-viz project housing management.
Recommended Citation
Ronald D. Glotta,
Tenant's Attorney: Evaluation of Impact,
2
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
247
(1968).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol2/iss1/11
Included in
Housing Law Commons, Legal Profession Commons, Legislation Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons