Part I of this article analyzes the background to the Teal decision and the treatment by the majority and dissent of the issue known in employment discrimination law as the "bottom line" limitation to the disparate impact theory of employment discrimination. Part II explains why, for reasons beyond those considered by the Teal majority, not only was the Court's rejection of the bottom line theory manifestly correct, but a contrary result would have had grievous consequences. Part III then argues for a similar rejection of the bottom line limitation in those situations where most observers have taken for granted that the bottom line limitation would apply.
James P. Scanlan,
The Bottom Line Limitation to the Rule of Griggs v. Duke Power Company,
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol18/iss3/5