Abstract
Court-annexed arbitration is utilized more extensively today than ever before. It commands widespread and increasing interest, not only because it serves the litigants well, but also because it offers to beleaguered courts a measure of relief from seriously overburdened dockets. This Article examines the use of court-annexed arbitration as an alternative method of dispute resolution. Part I describes how court-annexed arbitration works and the goals it is designed to achieve. Part II focuses on what the actual experience with court-annexed arbitration has been. Utilizing data from a recent empirical study on court-annexed arbitration by the Federal Judicial Center, this section sets forth the elements that are critical to the success of a model court-annexed arbitration plan and discusses the general advantages a court annexed approach holds over traditional formal trial proceedings.
Recommended Citation
A. L. Levin,
Court-Annexed Arbitration,
16
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
537
(1983).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol16/iss3/8