Abstract
Current statutory and case law provide for the compensation of select categories of persons and entities that provide evidence to the federal government. This compensation scheme is inequitable insofar as it treats similarly situated persons and entities dissimilarly. This Note advocates the adoption of a blanket statutory provision to compensate all third party custodians for incurred costs in producing documents in compliance with a subpoena duces tecum issued on behalf of a federal authority. Part I describes the current federal reimbursement scheme. Part II examines the inequities that the current statutory scheme imposes upon similarly situated entities and argues for the adoption of a blanket reimbursement statute.
Recommended Citation
Norman Gross,
Government Compensation for the Costs of Producting Subpoenaed Documents: A Proposal for Legislative Reform,
16
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
603
(1983).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol16/iss3/12