This article will assess the constitutionality of the statute providing for a GBMI verdict by examining the likely, impact of this statute on the constitutional rights of legally insane defendants. Part I will briefly outline the relevant provisions of the GBMI statute. Part II will consider whether legally insane defendants have a constitutional right to an insanity defense. Part III will then argue that some defendants, though legally insane at the time they committed allegedly criminal acts, will nevertheless be found GBMI rather than NGRI.
John M. Grostic,
The Constitutionality of Michigan's Guilty But Mentally Ill Verdict,
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol12/iss1/7