This article will consider some of the theoretical and practical ramifications of the Williams decision and compare its protections to the protections offered by Miranda. The article, focussing on the right to counsel, discusses the nature of the police conduct which is prohibited by each decision, the time at which the protections involved become effective, and the standard by which a waiver of the rights will be measured. The article concludes that there may be significant differences in the application of the two cases and that a uniform rule based on the sixth amendment may be superior to the present approach.
Mitchell L. Chyette,
The Right to Counsel in Police Interrogation Cases: Miranda and Williams,
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol12/iss1/5