My theme here is the conflict between the visibility of the appellate judge and recent procedural changes designed to cope with the quantum leaps in the numbers and complexity of cases. I will develop that theme, first, by suggesting the ways that three of the major controls on the system, namely the selection, evaluation, and discipline of judges, depend upon the exercise of recognizable and individual judicial responsibility; second, by illustrating how this "imperative" can be undermined if devices intended to cope with increased volume are adopted without vigilance; and finally by pointing up some approaches to permit courts to adjust to the demands of volume while retaining visible individual responsibility for decisions.
Mary M. Schroeder,
Judicial Administration and Invisible Justice,
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol11/iss3/3