Bank Securities Activities and the Need to Separate Trust Departments from Large Commercial Banks

Authors

Thomas J. Schoenbaum, University of North CarolinaFollow

Abstract

This article (1) analyzes the traditional Glass-Steagall Act restrictions on banks and the leading case of Investment Company Institute v. Camp, where the Supreme Court held that the offering by commercial banks of commingled agency accounts violated the Glass-Steagall Act prohibition against underwriting securities, (2) considers the. developments since that decision, and (3) offers suggestions on an approach to devising solutions to the policy questions involved.

Recommended Citation

Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Bank Securities Activities and the Need to Separate Trust Departments from Large Commercial Banks, 10 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 1 (1976).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol10/iss1/2