Abstract
This article will describe how the World Court has abstained in a way that not only expresses its commitment to principled government but also implements a coordinate, participation-inducing agenda. The article argues that the most recent jurisprudence of the ICJ manifests an acceleration of this tendency in response not only to the need to conserve judicial resources in light of the increased use of the Court by States, but also, and more significantly, to the enhanced law-making activity of the political organs of the U.N.
Recommended Citation
Antonio F. Perez,
The Passive Virtues and the World Court: Pro-Dialogic Abstentation by the International Court of Justice,
18
Mich. J. Int'l L.
399
(1997).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol18/iss3/1