This article offers three comparative insights. First, it concludes that comparative inquiries into presidential systems may be useful for those interested in constitutional government, regardless of historical, cultural, or other contextual differences among nations. Thus, nations with presidentialist constitutional systems may have common problems because of the institutional presidency. The article maintains that our presidential systems are in such states of disrepair that a fundamental reinvigoration of the legislative and judicial branches is required, so that government may better serve important constitutional values in our nations.
William C. Banks & Alejandro D. Carrió,
Presidential Systems in Stress: Emergency Powers in Argentina and the United States,
Mich. J. Int'l L.
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol15/iss1/1