Abstract
This Note argues that U.S. courts and lawmakers should adopt some aspects of Japanese libel law. Part I compares the balances struck in U.S. and Japanese libel law between promoting press freedoms and protecting individual interests. Part II focuses on the extent to which each system succeeds in addressing the objectives of encouraging aggressive, accurate reporting, and compensating libel victims. Finally, Part III proposes a new U.S. libel standard that would adopt, with some modifications, key elements of Japanese libel law without running afoul of established U.S. constitutional requirements.
Recommended Citation
Ellen M. Smith,
Reporting the Truth and Setting the Record Straight: An Analysis of U.S. and Japanese Libel Laws,
14
Mich. J. Int'l L.
871
(1993).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol14/iss4/6
Included in
Communications Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, First Amendment Commons