Abstract
The District Court fundamentally misconceived the law as applicable to the Plaintiffs claim by concluding that there may be no relationship, as a matter of law, between telling a bank customer what to wear and sex discrimination. It also misapplied Rule 12(b)(6) to the extent that it resolved any factual questions beyond the allegations of the Complaint regarding the basis of the Bank's different treatment of the Plaintiff. Finally, because the District Court incorrectly dismissed the single federal claim in Plaintiffs Complaint, it improperly dismissed Plaintiffs pendant state claims for want of federal court jurisdiction.
Recommended Citation
Jennifer L. Levi & Mary L. Bonauto,
Brief for the Plaintiff-Appellant Lucas Rosa in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Lucas Rosa V. Park West Bank and Trust Company on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts,
7
Mich. J. Gender & L.
147
(2001).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl/vol7/iss2/2
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Sexuality and the Law Commons