Abstract
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash and similar mobile-based transportation network companies (TNCs) have been involved in numerous legal battles in multiple jurisdictions. One contested issue concerns whether TNC drivers are employees or independent contractors. Uber recently lost this battle to some extent in the UK, but won it in California. Another issue concerns the TNCs’ use of mandatory (pre-dispute) arbitration clauses in their standard form service agreements with both drivers and passengers. These arbitration clauses purport to obligate such future plaintiffs to resolve any dispute with the defendant TNC outside of court and, typically, on an individual rather than a class basis. TNCs have had mixed success enforcing arbitration clauses contained in service agreements with their drivers under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). As for passengers, TNCs have been increasingly litigating disability-based discrimination claims brought against them and/or their drivers pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These claims have largely arisen in two situations.
Recommended Citation
Tamar Meshel,
Mobile-Based Transportation Companies, Mandatory Arbitration, and the Americans with Disabilities Act,
2021
J. L. & MOB.
1
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/jlm/vol2021/iss1/1
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Disability Law Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Transportation Law Commons