Abstract
This Article lays out the potential (at this point purely theoretical) deterrence benefits of replacing our current auto tort regime (including auto products liability law, driver-based negligence claims, and auto no-fault regimes) with a single, comprehensive automaker enterprise liability system. This new regime would apply not only to Level 5 vehicles, but to all automobiles made and sold to be driven on public roads. Because such a system would make automakers unconditionally responsible for the economic losses resulting from any crashes of their vehicles, it would in effect make automakers into auto insurers as well, although such a change will likely lead to some restructuring in how automobiles are insured and sold. Or so I will argue.
Recommended Citation
Kyle D. Logue,
The Deterrence Case for Comprehensive Automaker Enterprise Liability,
2019
J. L. & MOB.
1
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/jlm/vol2019/iss1/1
