Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2013
Abstract
Editor’s Note: Professor Ellen D. Katz writes and teaches about election law, civil rights and remedies, and equal protection. She and the Voting Rights Initiative at Michigan Law filed a brief as amicus curiae in Shelby County v. Holder, on which the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments February 27. Here, she examines why Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bears consideration in the case, which involves a challenge to Section 5 of the act.
Recommended Citation
Katz, Ellen D. "Shelby County v. Holder: Why Section 2 Matters." Law Quad. Notes 56, no. 1 (2013): 52-3.
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Courts Commons, Election Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legislation Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons