(Re)Solving the Tribal No-Forum Conundrum: Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
Abstract
Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, a dispute over a controversial off-reservation Indian casino, is the latest opportunity for the Supreme Court to address the doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity. The Court could hand Michigan a big win by broadly abrogating tribal immunity, and in turn wreak havoc on modern tribal governance. Alternately, the Court could hand Bay Mills a victory by affirming the tribe’s immunity, effectively precluding judicial review of the tribe’s casino project. In this Essay, Professor Matthew L.M. Fletcher argues that neither choice is preferable to a third option that would both advance tribal self-determination and hold tribes accountable to outsiders. The Court could condition tribal immunity in federal or state court on whether the tribe has solved the no-forum problem by providing a tribal forum for the resolution of important disputes.
Recommended Citation
Fletcher, Matthew. "(Re)Solving the Tribal No-Forum Conundrum: Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community." Yale Law Journal Online 123 (2013): 311-19. (Work published when author not on Michigan Law faculty.)
Comments
Work published when author not on Michigan Law faculty.