Last year (the year I gave the talk on which this article is based) marked the fortieth anniversary of Miranda v. Arizona,' one of the most praised, most maligned-and probably one of the most misunderstood-Supreme Court cases in American history. It is difficult, if not impossible, to evaluate Miranda without looking back at the test for the admissibility of confessions that preceded it.
Kamisar, Yale. "On the Fortieth Anniversary of the Miranda Case: Why We Needed It, How We Got It--And What Happened to It." Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 5, no. 1 (2007): 163-203.