Document Type
Response or Comment
Publication Date
1-1910
Abstract
The recent Maryland case of Green v. T. A. Shoemaker & Co., reported in 73 Atlantic Reporter, 688, (June, 1909) puts this jurisdiction squarely on the side of those courts that do allow recovery for fright alone, if physical injury is caused thereby. The court confesses that "the numerical weight of authority supports the general rule that there can be no recovery for nervous affections unaccompanied by contemporaneous physical injury," but nevertheless holds firmly with the minority of the courts to the view that there are exceptions to this rule and that this case falls within the exceptions.
Recommended Citation
Drake, Joseph H. "Fright without Physical Impact but Resulting in Physical Injury." Mich. L. Rev. 8 (1910): 44-6.