Probability and Proof in State v. Skipper: An Internet Exchange

Authors

Ronald J. Allen, Northwestern UniversityFollow
David J. Balding, University of London
Peter Donnelly, University of ChicagoFollow
Richard D. Friedman, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
David H. Kaye, Arizona State UniversityFollow
Lewis Henry LaRue, Washington and Lee University
Roger C. Park, University of MinnesotaFollow
Bernard Robertson, Massey UniversityFollow
Alexander Stein, Hebrew University

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1995

Abstract

This is not a conventional article. It is an edited version of messages sent to an Internet discussion list. The listings begin with the mention of a recent opinion of the Connecticut Supreme Court, parts of which are reproduced below. The listings soon move to broader issues concerning probability and other formal systems, their limitations, and their uses either in court or as devices for understanding legal proof.

Comments

This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.

Recommended Citation

Friedman, Richard D. "Probability and Proof in State v. Skipper: An Internet Exchange." R. J. Allen et al., co-authors. Jurimetrics 35, no. 3 (1995): 277-310.