Article Title
If All Other Options Fail: The Plight of Wild Horses and the Dubois Case for Horse Slaughtering
Abstract
Robert Redford recently joined forces with former presidential candidate Bill Richardson to stop the return of horse slaughtering to the United States. Few among us would bet against that duo in their fight for a cause that appears on its face to be unassailably just. Yet, horse slaughtering is a highly complex issue that boasts its fair share of credible supporters, and the activity is poised for a revival after a six-year ban if Redford, Richardson, and various animal rights groups do not win a recently-brought federal lawsuit. This Comment recommends a multi-pronged approach to solving the problem of wild horse overpopulation—the most commonly-raised justification for horse slaughter—but also supports a highly regulated return of slaughter if the wild horse crisis proves to be unsolvable by less bloody means.
Recommended Citation
Brendan Vandor,
Comment,
If All Other Options Fail: The Plight of Wild Horses and the Dubois Case for Horse Slaughtering,
47
U. Mich. J. L. Reform Caveat
1
(2013).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr_caveat/vol47/iss1/1
Citation Note
This Comment was originally cited as Volume 3 of the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Online. Volumes 1, 2, and 3 of MJLR Online have been renumbered 45, 46, and 47 respectively. These updated Volume numbers correspond to their companion print Volumes. Additionally, the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Online was renamed Caveat in 2015.