Abstract
Psychiatric advance directives are a valuable tool for individuals with mental illnesses. Ulysses directives, in particular, allow individuals to bind themselves to treatment in advance of needing it for the purpose of overcoming illness-induced refusals. This Note evaluates the effectiveness of state advance directive statutes in three areas that are especially important for Ulysses directives: defining competency to execute, activate, and revoke directives; waiving the constitutional right to refuse treatment; and encouraging provider compliance. This Note ultimately advocates for other states to adopt provisions similar to a Washington State statute. The Washington statute authorizes Ulysses directives by allowing advance consent to treatment, establishing a mechanism for overriding refusals, and permitting irrevocability, but it also provides flexibility so that individuals can craft a personalized plan for their needs.
Recommended Citation
Breanne M. Sheetz,
The Choice to Limit Choice: Using Psychiatric Advance Directives to Manage the Effects of Mental Illness and Support Self-Responsibility,
40
U. Mich. J. L. Reform
401
(2007).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol40/iss2/5
Included in
Health Law and Policy Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Legislation Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons