Abstract
This article's purpose is not to search for particular conclusions as to the substantive merit or the present legal status of the right of humanitarian intervention as defined and in view of this seeming tension between recent practice and established principle. Its governing concern, rather, lies with: fundamental principles of analysis and method; the formal sources of public international law consulted in the examination of the validity of humanitarian intervention; how normative determinations are reached in the first place; and the techniques which are adopted in navigating our course to these ends.
Recommended Citation
Dino Kritsiotis,
Reappraising Policy Objections to Humanitarian Intervention,
19
Mich. J. Int'l L.
1005
(1998).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol19/iss4/2