Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2026

Abstract

The American tort system aspires to provide fair compensation to injured plaintiffs, regardless of socioeconomic status, race, religion, or gender. Recent experimental evidence from psychology suggests, however, that factfinders consistently judge identical harms as less severe when experienced by individuals of lower socioeconomic status (SES). People presume, for instance, that a paper cut hurts a wealthy person more than a less well-off person, that domestic violence inflicts greater suffering on a high-SES woman than a lower-SES woman, and that bullying harms a five- year-old from a high-SES family more severely than one from a low- SES family. This Essay examines how this “thick skin bias” threatens to undermine the compensatory function of tort law, particularly for plaintiffs who are already socioeconomically disadvantaged.

While scholars have long lamented that pecuniary damages can perpetuate existing economic inequality by compensating high- earning and high-asset plaintiffs more generously than their less well-off peers, comparatively little attention has been paid to how nonpecuniary damages might be distorted by psychological biases affecting perceptions of suffering experienced by people of different socioeconomic strata.

Comments

© 2026 DePaul Law Review. Reproduced with permission.

Download


Share

COinS