Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-2019
Abstract
The theoretically global responsibility to protect refugees is today heavily skewed, with just ten countries – predominantly very poor – hosting more than half of the world’s refugee population. Refugee protection has moreover become tantamount to warehousing for most refugees, with roughly half of the world’s refugees stuck in “protracted refugee situations” for decades with their lives on hold. Both concerns – the unprincipled allocation of responsibility based on accidents of geography and the desperate need for greater attention to resettlement as a core protection response – cry out for a global, managed system to protect refugees.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2019-0006
Recommended Citation
Hathaway, James C. "Assigning Protection: Can Refugee Rights and State Preferences be Reconciled?" J. Institutional & Theoretical Econ. 175, no. 1 (2019): 33-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2019-0006
Included in
Human Rights Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons
Comments
Available on the publisher's website at https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2019-0006.