Article Title
Abstract
In Evenwel v. Abbott the Supreme Court left open the question of whether states could employ population measures other than total population as a basis for drawing representative districts so as to meet the requirement of "one person, one vote" (OPOV). It was thought that there was little prospect of resolving this question soon as no appropriate instances of such behavior were known. That belief was mistaken. In this Essay I report on the Town of Groton, Connecticut, which uses registered voter data to apportion seats in its Representative Town Meeting and has done so since its incorporation in 1957. The resulting apportionment arguably meets the requirements of OPOV as applied to registered voter data but badly fails if total population is employed. Thus, it would make a good test case to resolve some of the open questions in Evenwel.
Recommended Citation
Paul H. Edelman,
Is Groton the Next Evenwel?,
117
Mich. L. Rev. Online
63
(2018).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr_online/vol117/iss1/5
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Election Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons