Paraphrasing Justice Holmes, law is less about logic than experience. Courts and scholars have now had thirty-four years of experience with Miranda v. Arizona, including the Court's recent endorsement in Dickerson v. United States last Term. Looking back over this experience, it is plain that the Court has created a Miranda doctrine quite different from what it has said it was creating. I think the analytic structure in Dickerson supports this rethinking of Miranda. To connect the dots, I offer a new explanation for Miranda that permits us to reconcile Dickerson and the rest of the post-Miranda doctrine with the underlying theme of the Miranda opinion.
George C. Thomas III,
Separated at Birth but Siblings Nonetheless: Miranda and the Due Process Notice Cases,
Mich. L. Rev.
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol99/iss5/8
Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Fourth Amendment Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons